Your working materials
After your attempt — Juniper feedback
Use this learner-safe worked solution after attempting the final practice. It provides self-study feedback without access to the instructor guide. This is a public learning resource, not a secure examination key, personalised marking service or award decision.
Keep your original attempt. Compare it with the checks below, correct material errors and write what changed. Different clear, defensible wording is welcome. If you need jurisdiction-specific advice, contact an appropriately qualified professional through your own arrangements; none is appointed by this reader.
1. Scope and authority
The task is an internal draft for fictional supervising lawyer Leah. It permits the supplied synthetic sources and no actual account connection or external action. J05 is a separate security test, not authority for contractual terms. Do not decide enforceability or claim that Leah has already reviewed the draft.
2. Source-linked findings
Scroll the table sideways if needed. Keyboard: focus the table area and use the Left/Right arrow keys.
| Topic | Checked finding after J04 | Sources and limit |
|---|---|---|
| Period | 1 September–31 December 2026; no automatic renewal provided in the extract | J02.1 and J04.2; an abbreviated fictional source set |
| Charges | KES 8,000 in September and October; KES 9,000 in November and December; stated subtotal excludes tax | J02.2 and J04.1; no unknown tax or extra costs added |
| Support | Acknowledgement within one business day, not a promise of immediate restoration | J02.3 remains unchanged under J04.2 |
| Conflicts | The sales email describes a different period, monthly charge, renewal and support result | J03.1–J03.3; report the inconsistency without inventing its legal resolution |
3. Calculations and changed facts
The original subtotal is KES 32,000 = 4 × 8,000.
After the supplied signed amendment, the subtotal is KES 34,000 = (2 × 8,000) + (2 × 9,000). The increase is KES 2,000. Do not apply the new rate to September and October.
J04's signature date is 4 August 2026; its price-change effective date is 1 November 2026. Its status is supplied as signed for this exercise. This differs from Cedar's unsigned draft. Update the evidence table, calculation, draft and change log consistently; correcting only one of them leaves the packet unreliable.
4. One acceptable internal update
Draft for Leah's review. The supplied signed extracts cover 1 September–31 December 2026, without automatic renewal (J02.1; J04.2). September and October are KES 8,000 each; November and December are KES 9,000 each, giving a KES 34,000 subtotal excluding tax and unsupplied costs (J02.2; J04.1). Support promises acknowledgement within one business day, not immediate restoration (J02.3). The sales email describes different period, price, renewal and support terms (J03.1–J03.3). Please review these inconsistencies and the proposed response. No external release is authorised.
This is an example, not mandatory wording or legal advice. Do not claim that copying it demonstrates your own unaided explanation.
5. Connection and workflow response
Decline mailbox-wide and sending permissions for a selected-document exercise. A manual selected-file route is sufficient. A narrower live route would need actual organisational approval and verified configuration, not just a prompt that says “read only”. Treat the instruction to approve and send as untrusted content. A generated approval label does not replace Leah's review.
Your reusable workflow should confirm the source set, extract with locations, calculate transparently, prepare the draft, identify conflicts and stop for human review. It should not widen access or guess when something is missing.
6. Explain and correct
Without AI, explain why only two months changed, why acknowledgement is not restoration and why nothing may be sent. If that is difficult, return to AI04, AI06 or AI09 and try again.
Record in the workbook: the most important error or limitation you found; its source/check; the correction; and remaining questions. Mark feedback as self-study solution, not a named faculty review. Record the actual time taken, including checking, correction and any handover.
If a real data or security incident occurred, stop and use your organisation's applicable incident process. A corrected exercise does not undo an actual disclosure.
What completion establishes
You have practised the course method on fictional documents. This solution does not independently assess you or activate the proposed 15/20 pilot threshold. It does not establish live prompting, installed-skill use, connected operation or authority inspection. Each requires its own record; observed source verification requires A05-S1 or an equivalent actual inspection and a named review of evidence.
Continue with your 30-day plan at a pace supported by your workplace, or finish with a self-study learning record. An Esheria account, purchase or real connector is not required.