Disputes / Companion to the guide

Before you build your chronology

Set the scope, source set and handover for the fictional chronology exercise.

Return to the main guide
On this page

Primary reader: junior disputes paralegal. Intended recipient: supervising lawyer, not a court or counterparty. Prerequisites: read short records, use a spreadsheet/text table, and distinguish a statement from an inference.

Prepare a neutral working chronology of what the supplied records say about the JX-18 delivery, quantity, condition and follow-up. Include inconvenient or conflicting accounts. Identify the source of each event and questions requiring instructions. Do not determine breach, liability, remedies, admissibility, privilege, filing obligations or statutory deadlines.

Baseline cut-off: the packet supplied on the fictional date 13 June 2026. Files D01–D10 are the entire starting set; D10 duplicates D05. Do not assume the existence or content of photos, contracts, witness statements, delivery confirmations or native messages not included. The later D11/D12 packet is supplied only for the changed-input task.

Stated matter-local offset: UTC+03:00. Preserve each source’s own offset; D07’s forwarding header is UTC. A document’s date is not necessarily its event date, creation timestamp or proof of dispatch/receipt. Do not infer a missing time zone or replace unknown dates with midnight.

Open the .eml files as plain text or use a mail application’s source view so the original Date header and offset remain visible. Do not rely on a mail application’s converted display time, and do not send or reply to these fictional messages. The source index uses the supplied raw headers.

Deliver: a source index; chronology; short open-questions handover; and, for later updates, a change log. A successful output can differ from the model’s wording or split/group a particular observation differently, provided dates, attribution, source links and material uncertainty remain correct.

Keep the synthetic files unchanged. Use working copies for extraction. The role name in a row is a suggested escalation responsibility, not an actual appointment or approval. If applying the method to a real matter, first obtain the relevant instructions and permissions from its authorised lawyer. This prototype does not grant those permissions.

The supplied evidence retains its original 0.1.0 source-edition labels and bytes. Guide version 0.1.1 packages that same evidence with revised instructions and tools. Start with the blank workbook, or use both templates/chronology-blank.csv and templates/change-log-blank.csv with the field guide.

Main guide: article.md. Current status and download versions: README.md.